How do we avoid the ‘moral defeat’ of our Egos? Well I guess it's by not letting the ego get beyond itself, and perhaps the balancing
trick between ego and unconscious is the point referred to as ‘enlightenment’. Enlightenment seems to be the place where we decide
that we’ve got enough stuff and anymore is just going to rot in the double garage; time to chuck-out any useless facades
and use our unconscious ‘knowing’ to guide us.
To do that we have to be aware that our mirror reflections are continually reinforced by the conversations of our brains: ‘…the brain is never truly resting, but spontaneously active and constantly switching between different resting state ‘networks’.
This is where the time honored method of slowing the brain with meditatative techniques lends credence to Pantanjali claims of superpowers. Get on the ground, turn off the phone, and stop the self evaluations of reflected glory for just a little while.
While we keep promoting the myth of ego dominance we prevent the power of the
universal unconscious from playing its proper role, we become automatons of societies preconceived expectations. T
The finite world may be an illusion since philosophers cannot conceive of finite objectivity in a universe that is scientifically infinite; so perhaps the value of meditation comes from its ability to tap into the knowing of the collective unconscious, which probably includes creation itself, that mother of all things that showed its hand 13.8 billion years ago when it started with a ‘Big Bang’.
Ask someone living on the street and you’ll get a definitive answer, but at the other end there must be a level beyond which more
stuff eats into our happiness by way of chores, worry and responsibilities. Of course really rich people are not so much concerned
with happiness as they are with egocentric notions of prestige, purchasing power and influence.
A survey (450,000 people) of emotional well-being and family income done in 2008-2009 came up with an optimum family income of $75,000
US. The researchers concluded: ‘...high income buys life satisfaction but not happiness, and that low income is associated both with
low life evaluation and low emotional well-being.’
A more recent survey ups the ante and shows differing happiness incomes for
differing cultures, with the average being $161,000 US.
And then the article goes on to the ‘feeling wealthy’ category where the global average was $1.8 mill, with Singaporeans needing the
most at $2.6 mill followed by Hong Kong with $2.46 mill, which may be saying something about repressed societies. ‘Hong Kong has witnessed
slow erosion of the rule of law in recent years, exemplified by increasingly strict police controls on assemblies and processions...’by comparison, in the relaxed environs of Australia, rich seems to equate to an annual income of anything more than $200,000
AUD.
Money seems to be important for happiness due to its ability to create the environment in which we are happy and in neuroscience
that sensory ‘happiness’ can be measured by neuroimaging. So whose the happiest person in the world?
So far tests have Matthieu Ricard, a Buddhist monk and son of a French philosopher, to be the happiest man in the world, andMatthieu reckons: "If you can learn how to ride a bike you can learn how to be happy."
Here are some of Mathieu’s tips:
· Look for happiness in the right place.
· To
be truly happy we have to get rid of hatred, obsession, arrogance, envy, greed and pride.
· Happiness is not the pursuit of an endless succession of experiences, that's a recipe for exhaustion more than happiness. Happiness
is a way of being, unlike pleasure, which exhausts itself as you experience it.
· Everyone
would be helped by meditating for half-an-hour a day.
Just suppose that there were no dichotomies of finite and infinite, ego and unconscious, male and female, yin and yang, wrongs and right, black and white. Imagine what a boring place it would be; you couldn’t get your juices going over inequalities, misogyny, abortion and same sex marriage.
Sexual reproduction started half a million years before the brain was invented and prior to that humble
bacteria were quite happy just splitting up and being themselves. But you know the rules of warfare – ‘divide and conquer’ and if
we didn’t have all our modern day vexations then there’d be no headlines, just the same old bacteria Joe making it to his 3.8 billionth
birthday with fungi, algae and sponges ruling the land; no familial duties, no hierarchies, no egocentric behaviour.
The question
is still out there – why did sexual reproduction gain prominence? One of the main reasons given is that ‘this reproduction process
[asexual] does not produce varying offspring, which means that the entire group can be wiped out by a single disease, or when the
environment becomes unstable’. But hang on, hasn’t Golden Staph taken over hospitals?
In these days of health enlightenment with healthy fats and healthy gut flora, it would seem that clean dirty hands are part of a healthy life while household cleaners, sun screens, repellents, fumigants, and all the other crap we use to ‘protect us from the microbes’ are of dubious value. Bacteria win, as they always have, since they don’t have to put up with whinging partners.
But then imagine the dichotomous opposite where
two people have understanding and respect for each other’s differences whilst sharing the essential task of bringing
the next generation into the world, surrounded by a neighborhood that provides caring none-judgmental support and
inspires each of us to build the rainbow arch over a better and brighter future. Nah stuff the bacteria,
I think I'll go with the dream.
...understanding that everything is energy means that:
How long will it take for us to wake up and realise not just who we are but what we are a part of?
Could it be that we avoid the truth of these understandings at all costs as they bring a level of responsibility to our lives that most are not ready or willing to accept?
Do we avoid these understandings, as to put them into practice would rock our comfort boats just a bit too much? For example, what if we could no longer blame others for the state of our life – realising instead that we are intrinsically connected with everything that happens to us in one way or another?
The reward pathway works via the chemical dopamine and this neurotransmitter mediates our desire for sensory, cognitive,
social, aesthetic and moral pleasures. The memory apparatus of our brain records the trigger processes of the reward pathway
for the sake of future repeats, and we do this to the extent that ritualistic behaviour has become incorporated into human
evolution.
But strangely enough wanting doesn’t always equate to enjoying which is something ‘generated by a smaller set of
hedonic hot spots within the limbic system’. You may want a cigarette, a cream bun, a bit of a chat, some honky tonk or even a prayer
session in a giant cathedral, but whether it does the trick as far as being pleasurable is another thing.
And if it does there
may still be a difference between your subjective measure of how good it was and the objective firing up of your brain cells. You
may have enjoyed the film because you thought you wouldn’t, but someone else who thought they would, was a little disappointed. But
who actually enjoyed it more? Who was buzzing and vocal and wanting to follow up with drinks?
The objective response of who
actually enjoyed it more can be measured by neuroimaging and surprisingly - ‘Pleasures of food, sex, addictive drugs, friends and
loved ones, music, art, and even sustained states of happiness can produce strikingly similar patterns of brain activity.’
And to complicate matters further the same centres that mediate wanting and liking are also involved in the mediation of pain, fear and disgust. That scary roller coaster ride was fantastic, and the fear I overcame facing the crowd made it all worthwhile - as the trepidation of a dark night awoke in the brilliance of day.